'Temple Cleansing' in Malaysia and Pakistan
An Indian blogger in Malaysia named Sharanya Manivannan recently posted an open letter to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh (thanks BitchPhD), asking him to take a stand on the Hindu temple demolitions that have been occurring in the country:
Elsewhere in the letter she points out that the Indian government did send a letter of "official displeasure" to the Danish government following the publication of the anti-Islamic cartoons. Why the silence so far on the "temple cleansing" in Malaysia? She also makes some poignant comments about how Indians are treated as a whole in Malaysia, which I'll come back to below.
Some background: In the past few months, Malaysian authorities have demolished a number of Hindu temples in different parts of the country, stating that they were built without a proper permit. But local Hindus have complained that they had applied for permits, sometimes waiting as long as 30 years for a response! Moreover, according to the BBC, at least two of the temples destroyed were more than a century old, which clearly suggests that getting a permit to build is not at all the issue driving the demolitions.
Indeed, it seems pretty clear that these demolitions are part of an organized campaign in a country that is growing increasingly intolerant of religious minorities. (Churches and other religious structures have also been demolished along the same lines.)
Indians make up about 8% of the settled population of Malaysia, which amounts to about 2 million people, and the majority of Malaysian Indians are Hindus. For the most part they have lived in Malaysia in peace (communal violence is very rare), but Indian Malaysians do often complain of discrimination and mistreatment. They have traditionally been a working class population, who came to Malaysia initially to work on rubber plantations.
This turn is especially sad, as Malaysia (like Indonesia) has ancient connections to India and Hinduism. Tamil traders established settlements there as far back as the third century A.D., and ruins of ancient Hindu temples have recently been discovered.
Which brings us back to Sharanya Manivannan. In her blog post, she talks about a picture she saw in the newspaper that encapsulated for her the emotion these temple demolitions provoke in her. It was a picture unrelated to the demolitions, but somehow it triggered her to finally take some positive action:
Hindu groups are starting to organize and actively protest. The Indian Financial Express reports that Indian groups have been appealing to the Malaysian Prime Minister.
Also, in some of the press coverage of the temple demolitions, some Malaysian authorities have begun to express concern that Hindus may begin to turn violent in resisting the demolitions. In fact, the tenor of the resistance is already changing: several people were injured and arrested when they refused to vacate the premises of a temple that was about to be demolished. I wouldn't advocate violence, obviously. But it may be time to get Gandhian on their asses: mass public demonstrations, and a campaign of nonviolent resistance. (And yes, Sharanya, keep blogging about it: make it personal, tell the world your version of the story.)
Two additional wrinkles:
While the Malaysian press, according to the blogger Sharanya I quoted above, has remained silent about the Hindu temple demolitions occurring in the country, I did find articles in Malaysian newspapers about the Hindu temple demolition that recently occurred in Lahore. [UPDATE: The temple may not have been demolished after all...]
Secondly, a version of this has been occuring in recent months (in reverse) in India itself, as an important 300 year old Sufi Dargah was pulled down in Vadodara (formerly Baroda), leading to communal riots that left six people dead. To be clear, Mandirs were also demolished in this campaign (now halted) in the interest of "development," but the lead-in to the Express India story reminds us that India is itself far from immune to indifference to the concerns of religious minorities:
[Cross-posted at Sepia Mutiny]
But I ask you this: when temples that stood for over a century are destroyed, what really dies? Not stone and statues. Not bells and prayers. Not – thankfully and thus far – people. You see, what frightens me is not the loss of these temples themselves, though architecturally speaking, that too is often a disappointment. What frightens me is what these temples are taken to represent, and by extension, what their demolitions therefore represent. (link)
Elsewhere in the letter she points out that the Indian government did send a letter of "official displeasure" to the Danish government following the publication of the anti-Islamic cartoons. Why the silence so far on the "temple cleansing" in Malaysia? She also makes some poignant comments about how Indians are treated as a whole in Malaysia, which I'll come back to below.
Some background: In the past few months, Malaysian authorities have demolished a number of Hindu temples in different parts of the country, stating that they were built without a proper permit. But local Hindus have complained that they had applied for permits, sometimes waiting as long as 30 years for a response! Moreover, according to the BBC, at least two of the temples destroyed were more than a century old, which clearly suggests that getting a permit to build is not at all the issue driving the demolitions.
Indeed, it seems pretty clear that these demolitions are part of an organized campaign in a country that is growing increasingly intolerant of religious minorities. (Churches and other religious structures have also been demolished along the same lines.)
Indians make up about 8% of the settled population of Malaysia, which amounts to about 2 million people, and the majority of Malaysian Indians are Hindus. For the most part they have lived in Malaysia in peace (communal violence is very rare), but Indian Malaysians do often complain of discrimination and mistreatment. They have traditionally been a working class population, who came to Malaysia initially to work on rubber plantations.
This turn is especially sad, as Malaysia (like Indonesia) has ancient connections to India and Hinduism. Tamil traders established settlements there as far back as the third century A.D., and ruins of ancient Hindu temples have recently been discovered.
Which brings us back to Sharanya Manivannan. In her blog post, she talks about a picture she saw in the newspaper that encapsulated for her the emotion these temple demolitions provoke in her. It was a picture unrelated to the demolitions, but somehow it triggered her to finally take some positive action:
It was a newpaper picture of a retired gardener, S. Sarimuthu, whose only daughter had died on June 11th as a result of viral eningoencephalitis and secondary pneumonia contracted while at National Service camp. In this picture of him, which I can't find online, he looks profoundly forlorn. He looks like his heart had been wrenched out of his body, pounded to a pulp, and then poured back inside.
This picture made me cry and cry and cry, and then write this letter. And cry even more the morning after I did, as I explained to someone what made me do it. The family wasn't Hindu. The girl wasn't the victim of genocidal hate-mongering. But I saw that picture and in my mind I saw that father at hospitals, at home -- I saw the way the nurses looked at him, the way the doctors spoke to him, the way hospital authorities dismissed him as she slipped into a coma. I saw him throughout his life, I saw the way this [f-ing] state in one way or another has taken away even this, even her. I saw the colour of his skin and the sheer, unmitigated loss in his eyes, the way his loss and the loss of these temples were entwined, and I could not not write this letter. (link)
Hindu groups are starting to organize and actively protest. The Indian Financial Express reports that Indian groups have been appealing to the Malaysian Prime Minister.
Also, in some of the press coverage of the temple demolitions, some Malaysian authorities have begun to express concern that Hindus may begin to turn violent in resisting the demolitions. In fact, the tenor of the resistance is already changing: several people were injured and arrested when they refused to vacate the premises of a temple that was about to be demolished. I wouldn't advocate violence, obviously. But it may be time to get Gandhian on their asses: mass public demonstrations, and a campaign of nonviolent resistance. (And yes, Sharanya, keep blogging about it: make it personal, tell the world your version of the story.)
Two additional wrinkles:
While the Malaysian press, according to the blogger Sharanya I quoted above, has remained silent about the Hindu temple demolitions occurring in the country, I did find articles in Malaysian newspapers about the Hindu temple demolition that recently occurred in Lahore. [UPDATE: The temple may not have been demolished after all...]
Secondly, a version of this has been occuring in recent months (in reverse) in India itself, as an important 300 year old Sufi Dargah was pulled down in Vadodara (formerly Baroda), leading to communal riots that left six people dead. To be clear, Mandirs were also demolished in this campaign (now halted) in the interest of "development," but the lead-in to the Express India story reminds us that India is itself far from immune to indifference to the concerns of religious minorities:
Two demolition drives, and two different ways of going about it. So while in Gujarat’s cultural capital Vadodara, the BJP went about doing a "balancing act" by razing a 300-year-old dargah, in Rajkot, the BJP fought the Municipal Commissioner tooth and nail for removing a small temple that was encroaching on RMC land. (link)
[Cross-posted at Sepia Mutiny]


16 Comments:
Great post! I've been to Malaysia twice. I've definitely heard Malaysians, usually Chinese, speak with negative biases about the nation's Indian population.
Thanks Ms World.
I gather the sense of discrimination or aggrievement might have something to do with Malaysia's "New Economic Policy", which was a kind of aggressive affirmative action program for the native Malays instituted in 1970s.
amardeep,
I read the Pakistani denial. It sounded fishy, and I would not be surprised if a temple in Pakistan was actually demolished. The Bhumiputra policy in Malaysia is a discriminatory policy against non "native" Malays. However, the Malaysian temple demolitions have more to do with religion than Malay vs non "Malay" discrimination. There is a rise in Islamic fundamentalism and associated terrorist activity in Malaysia.
The letter writer makes a very pertinent point, in my view. There are hardly any Islamic nations where religious minorities are not persecuted. The persecution is often a lot more severe than the simple demolition of a church or a temple. In this light, it is somewhat craven for the Indian govt to keep silent about this, while officially objecting to a bunch of cartoons published in a newspaper with a tiny audience. I think the letter writer is right to be apprehensive of what these demolitions portend. Finally, inspite of the demolition of the Dargah in Baroda (which was stupid and plainly communal), the position of religious minorities, both politically and legally, in India is not exactly comparable to the corresponding situation that minorities find themselves in countries like Malaysia.
BTW, as further proof that the Pakistanis are liars, here is an article from the Hindustan Times:
"Court Breather for Pak Temple":
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1721874,0035.htm
So much for the claim that the structure was not a temple and was some sort of residential place instead.
I think I spoke too soon: The GoI has
taken a position on the Pakistan temple issue, and hopefully will do the same with Malaysia.
"India takes up temple demolition with Pakistan".
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1720930,0008.htm
amardeep, great post. and could you point me to where you got the update that it may not have been a temple after all from? i just read in one of the pakistani papers that the lahore high court has ordered a stay at the site.
Ana, I saw it here.
And Vkrishna (any relation to 'VK'?), thanks for the links, and the update on the Government of India's position. I'll send that link to Sharanya, who will I'm sure be happy to hear it.
Oops, cancel that -- the position is just on the Lahore temple issue
i have a few malaysian friends of indian and chinese origin. at the beginning they all talk about how malaysia is a wonderful hormonious multicultural community, but as you get to know them better, they tell you the real story and why they are in australia, desperately trying to move their generations of accumulated wealth out of malaysia. the temple destruction is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to islamic chauvinism. it is a mere outward symbol of the direction malaysia is heading in. sharanya makes a telling point when she states that the killing of non-islamic people has not begun, thus far....
That link was very saddening. While this is based i think more on religious tha ethic lines, I've also see the other side of the coin where Malays are concered. I singapore for e.g which is often held up as best example of harmonious co-existence betwee races, still, I have see may Chinese look down upon both Indians and Malays. Not sure how widespread this is though. The Bumiputra policy's original grounds I think started off due to these plus ofcourse the economic disparities. Though its relevance today has become a big issue
thanks, amardeep. i usually don't put too much stock into what pakistani government ministers have to say. true or false, it brings attention yet again to the fact that some minorities and their places of worship have not always been treated fairly.
ejaz ul-haq (btw, isn't this general zia's son?)isn't entirely incorrect in correcting advani about religious freedom for minorities, but freedom to what extent? this always gets me in hot water with my fellow pakistanis though, who point out the accomplishments and advancements of minorities, so perhaps the less i say on this matter, the better.
I've been following this story and couldn't help but remember a trip to Kuala Lumpur last year and a stop at a shopping mall that had actually been built around a small Hindu temple (this was pointed out to me by a Tamil Christian driver).
Good post Amardeep.
I think one other thing to remember is that much as nationalists of all stripes might wish to imagine that "their" countries can be hermetically sealed, they almost never can be. Thus temple demolitions in Pakistan or Malaysia or wherever increase pressure on the Indian socio-political fabric, enabling certain ideologues to exploit and propagate the notion that India is already a de facto "Hindu-stan", by dint of its neighbors' actions. It's unfortunate, but it's a mindset that many Indian liberals have themselves been complicit in, when they (for instance) hail the Indo-Pak peace process as "good for communal peace" in India; the problem is one can't have it both ways, and say the Sangh Parivar is wrong to posit a Muslim = Pakistani equation, and yet it's a great thing for Hindu-Muslim relations if India and Pakistan share friendly relations. The two are sides of the same coin, and one can easily (and siturbingly does) shade into the other.
The Gujarat BJP example you brought up is instructive: because the Gujarat BJP wishes to make Gujarat the sort of polity that Pakistan already is (where minorities "know their place"); which explains the (to outsiders, paradoxical) fact that in Pakistan there are hardly any communal riots between Muslims and non-Muslims. The sad truth is that no-one bothers, as the minorities are politically irrelevant.
Gujarat serves as a reminder (because, given the "right" ideology, this sort of thing can happen anywhere) that the political future is still very much up for grabs in India (and far more hopeful signs do also exist on the communal front outside Gujarat; inside that state the picture is bleak indeed). In Pakistan what's depressing is the absence of any large-scale introspection on this issue, and the response of the government was typical: first deny that the relevant structure was a temple, and then simultaneously raise distracting issues. But nor can we simply blame the government; where are the protests? We keep hearing of Pakistan's vibrant civil society, and certainly on my own trips to Pakistan I have always been struck by the fesitiness of the media there -- yet minorities are not seen as an issue for Pakistan all too often (i.e. "minorities" only surface when there is a riot in India that is being covered, one might add often with an unseemly glee, of the "we always knew secularism was a sham" kind), with the result that (at least in my experience) many Pakistanis will simply say with a straight face that minorities aren't an issue, "because there are so few of them." The issue, of course, is never the number, but the justice of a particular arrangement -- though one might nevertheless consider the reasons why there are in fact so few minorties in Pakistan, a direct result of the inhospitable nature of the state's foundational ideology (alive and kicking, to the point where the only Bollywood films that have received permission for public screenings in Pakistan over the last few decades have "Muslim" themes: Mughal-e-Azam, Anaarkali, and now Taj Mahal; a Reena Roy film in the late 1970s got through-- except the film was dubbed, and all Hindu characters' names were changed to Muslim ones!) I do not see this situation changing for the better anytime soon, as the big difference from India is NOT the violence or lack thereof in any particular situation, but the fact that any steps to address the situation necessarily undermine the two-nation theory on which the state is premised. A thorny problem, as no state actively undermines its own founding principle.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
On the two nation theory and how that plays into the Pakistani state's policy on Bollywood, an interesting discussion:
http://www.naachgaana.com/2006/4/24/hrithik-manisha-at-taj-mahal-s-pakistan-premiere
Temple & all other religious symbolic places should be well protected by the government.
Post a Comment
<< Home