On-line Math 21

On-line Math 21

1.1  The idea of a limit

The idea of a limit is the fundamental distinction between calculus and all the mathematics that is typically labelled ``precalculus''. Whether we're dealing with the slope of a curve, the area of a region in the plane, or the speed of a moving object, the fundamental idea will always be the same; we want to find what the value of some function f(x) ought to be at a specific point a , based on its value at all nearby points. That's what a limit is, what the value of the function should be at the specific point. We say that that ``proper'' value is the limit of the function f(x) as x approaches the point a , or

lim
x® a 
f(x) = L.

As a specific example, let's look at the function
f(x) = x2-1
x-1
.
Here's the graph:

The first thing to notice about this function is that it isn't defined at x = 1 , that is, 1 is not in the domain of f . That's what that hole in the graph is about. It's not defined at x = 1 because both the numerator and the denominator are 0 there. This is what is called an indeterminate form, since a fraction like 0/0 can't really make sense without some further work. This is typical with limits, most problems come down to indeterminate forms, which are a signal that you need to do more work to figure the limit out.

But that seems silly. All I have to do is divide out the top and bottom by (x-1) and it would be defined. Well, there will be other examples where that isn't so easy, so let's pretend we didn't see that.

What should f(1) be? Well, the way I want to see that is to look at various values of f(x) for x near 1, and see where things are heading. here's a small table:
x
f(x)
0.5
1.5
0.8
1.8
0.9
1.9
0.99
1.99

I think I get the pattern. Of course, f(1) ought to be 2. But, you can see that just by knowing the values of the function, as x gets closer and closer to 2, without knowing how to simplify the expression so that the division by 0 doesn't appear. Most serious examples of this idea won't be simple enough so that you can just divide out and have it become obvious.

We write the result of this ``investigation'' as

lim
x® 1 
x2-1
x-1
= 2.

We need a formal definition of a limit. However, the really formal definition seems to have a lot of excess baggage that comes with it. It is needed, of course, but it is confusing at first. So, we'll start out with a slightly informal definition:

Definition 1 If f is a function defined on an interval (c,a) , and on (a,b) , then we say that the limit of f(x) as x approaches a , is L , written

lim
x® a 
f(x) = L,
if we can be sure that f(x) is as close as we need to L , by just taking x close enough to a .

For the formal, rigorous, definition, look at the official definition.

Remark 2 Note that the function doesn't have to be defined at a , but it does need to be defined at all points sufficiently close to a on either side. It can be the case that the function is defined at a , but that might not be the limit L .

Here is an example to show the idea of the limit. Even though, technically, the function represented by this graph is not defined at x = 2 , the closer you take x to 2 (click on a point of the graph), the closer y gets to 3 .

Let's look at some examples before going on.

Example 1 Let f(x) = 3x2+1 . Then

lim
x® 2 
f(x) =

Answer

Solution

Example 2 Let
f(x) = ì
í
î
3x+1
if x ³ 1
x+2
if x < 1
.

Then

lim
x® 1 
f(x) =

Answer

Solution

Example 3 Let
f(x) = ì
í
î
x2
if x ¹ 1
5
if x = 1
.
Then

lim
x® 1 
f(x) =

Answer

Solution

Example 4 Let f(x) = sin(1/x) . Then

lim
x® 0 
f(x)

Answer

Example 5 Let
f(x) = x3+1
x2-1
.

Then

lim
x® -1 
f(x) =

Answer

Solution

Copyright (c) 2000 by David L. Johnson.


File translated from TEX by TTH, version 2.61.
On 1 Oct 2000, 23:41.