Two responses to a recent question.........DMD ___________________________________________________________________ Subject: Re: response to response From: Tom Goodwillie Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:20:54 -0400 It's not true for n=1, if the circle is a nice compact space and the universal covering map from the open 1-disk to the circle is a nice map. Tom Goodwillie >>> >> From: Andre Henriques >>> >> Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 23:11:28 -0400 (EDT) >>> >> >>> >> Here's a harder question >>> >> related to that of Johannes Huebschmann >>> >> whose answer I'd be interested to know: >>> >> >>> >> Let D be the open n-disk and \bar D be the closed n-disk. >>> >> Let f be a 'nice' map from D to some 'nice' compact space X. >>> >> Is there a compactification B of D such that f extends to B and >>> >> such that the pair (B,D) is homeomorphic to the pair (\bar D,D)? >>> >> >>> >> Feel free to substitute 'nice' by any notion that you find convenient. >>> >> Andre Henriques _________________________________________________________________ Subject: Re: response to response From: Yuri Turygin Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 05:43:09 -0400 (EDT) The answer to Andre's question: A continuous map f:D\to X extends to \bar f:\bar D\to X if and only if f:D\to X is uniformly continuous. Pf: If f extends to \bar f, then DONE. Now, suppope f:D\to X is uniformly continuous. For each point on the boundary x\in \bar D\setminus D define \bar f(x):=lim(f(x_n)), where the sequence {x_n} is such that lim x_n = x. Now check that bar f is well defined. Suppose there exist {x_n} and {x'_n} such that lim x_n=lim x'_n = x, but lim(f(x_n))\neq lim(f(x'_n)). Then for any \delta you will find \delta-close to each other x_n and x'_n whose images f(x_n) and f(x'_n) will be \epsilon-far, where \epsilon is, say, d_X (lim(x_n), lim(x'_n))/2 (here d_X is a metric on X, but X doesn't have to be a metrizable compactum for my claim to be still true. My proof will also work with non-metric version of uniform continuity. X has only to be a Hausdorff compactum). Best, Yuri Turygin