Pre-Columbian Peruvian Metals

Sample 10

Tombaga Filigree

Vicus

North Coast, Peru

ca. 100 BC - 300 AD

Report by :

Laura Limata

June 5, 2003

Introduction
Figure 1: A macro photo of the object studied.
The area where the sample was removed from is labeled.
 
This sample is a nose filigree, which is any delicate and intricate ornamental work made from gold, silver, or other fine twisted wire. It was dated to the Vicus culture of northern Peru from the period between 100 BC and 300 AD. Grannulation is a technique that attaches tiny gold balls to larger pieces fro ornamentation. This technique evolved independently from the old world in places like Peru. The objective of this investigation was to determine the joining method used for the gold granulation of this filigree (nose piece).
Proceedure  
A small part of the granulation from this sample was removed from the upper right point of this sample with a jeweler’s saw as shown in Figure 1. The piece was then mounted in epoxy and ground on 600 grit Silicon Carbide paper until all three joints between the balls could be seen. The sample was then polished on 6 um diamond paste, 1 alumina um, and 0.3 um alumina polishes. The sample was cleaned ultrasonically in between each step to remove remnants of polishing compounds from the void in the center of the sample. The sample was finished by polishing with 0.05 um non-agglomerating alumina master prep. The sample was then photographed with a Nikon Camera mounted to an Olympus Light Optical Microscope (LOM). The sample was etched with an Aqua Regia solution consisting of 20 ml nitric acid, and 30 ml hydrochloric acid for four minutes. After etching it was ultrasonically cleaned in EDTA, and then ethanol to avoid staining. The etched sample was photographed again. The sample was also studied under Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and an Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS) scan was run to determine the composition.
Figure 2: Polished, but unetched sample showing the joined balls. Picture width is 1.5 mm.
Figure 3: Etched sample showing potential composition differences at the joints Picture width is 0.75 mm.
Results  
Figure 2 shows the polished, but unetched sample. Figure 3 shows the etched sample. Here the discoloration around the joints indicates that the composition may be different. Figure 4 is a close up on one of the joints that shows a moving grain boundary indicating diffusion. The EDS scans for the matrix and the joint are in Figures 5 and 6 respectively.
Figure 4: Etched sample showing a moving grain boundary.
Discussion  
Literature indicates that the technique of granulation developed in South America among cultures such as the Vicus in Peru. It requires the manufacture of small gold spheres, and a technique to attach them to the surface. The granules were formed by taking lengths of thin gold wire, and cutting it into small pieces. These pieces where then heated and turned into spheres by surface tension. Another technique used in Columbia was casting. The spheres studied here did have significant porosity as displayed in Figure 2. This could be an indication that these spheres were casted and not cut from wire as originally thought [1].
The granules then needed to be attached to the surface. Several techniques were used. One is a solder, although this is not likely here since there was not a significant compositional difference shown from the EDS scans between the matrix and the joint. Another technique used is in situ copper salt reduction. An organic glue was mixed with copper salts and used to attach the spheres to the base metal. The piece was then heated allowing the spheres to fuse. The use of a copper salt lowered the melting temperature of the metal, making it easier to fuse. This is a possible technique for this case because of the small amounts of copper picked up in the EDS analysis. This copper could also have come from the base metal, which is believed to be a tumbaga. Further analysis will be needed to see how the copper is spread throughout the joint, and if there is a high enough concentration. The third technique used is to simply glue the spheres, without salts, and allow the spheres to melt on their own. This would obviously require tight temperature control, and would be quiet difficult. This is actually a likely formation technique for this sample, because of the small compositional differences between the matrix and the joint. In addition, the moving grain boundary points to the fact that higher temperatures may have been used, which again gives this technique credibility [1].
Figure 5: EDS scan taken in the center of one of the balls.
Figure 6: EDS scan taken at the joint, showing a small increase in the amount of copper.
Future Work
This sample will be taken to the National Institute for Science and Technology (NIST) in Washington D.C for further analysis. A microprobe analysis will be run to determine the copper concentration distribution throughout the piece. This will make it easier to conclude which joining technique was used.
     
References

1. McEwan, Colin ed. PreColumbian Gold: Technology, Style and Iconography. Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers: Chicago, 2000. pg. 229.

Untitled Document

____________________________________

This site was last updated on July 25 2003