CDA of 1996 (continued)
Obscenity: Miller v. California 413 U.S. 15 (1973)a) the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interestb) depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state lawc) the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value