Subject: Re: names of htpy classes Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:09:53 +0100 From: "Brian Sanderson" > From: Ezra Getzler ..stuff deleted.. > Japanese has a complex system of counters: long thin objects are counted > > by the suffix -hon (ippon, nihon, ...), small round objects by -ko, ... > I wonder what the counter for homotopy classes is. > > Ezra Getzler Similarly the Chinese have a prefix. I wonder what that is for homotopy classes. Brian Sanderson ________________________________________________________ Subject: Re: names of htpy classes Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:14:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Goodwillie So it's just a coincidence that an upper-case eta looks like H for Hopf. _________________________________________________________ Subject: Re: names of htpy classes Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:36:05 -0500 From: Bill Richter From: Ezra Getzler In partial support of Rognes's interesting conjecture on homotopy groups of spheres, four in Japanese is yon (epsilon). Actually, it would be better were epsilon replaced by upsilon. The next one would then be gamma (five=go). That's interesting, Ezra, as first really new element after sigma is epsilon, and I think the next really new element is mu. Dunno what upsilon or gamma is in Toda's book. Epsilon is in the 8 stem, born on S^3 with Hopf invariant nu^2. The 8 stem also has nu-bar = {nu, eta, nu}, born on S^6 with Hopf inv nu, and eta sigma = epsilon + nu-bar. Maybe nu-bar reminds Toda too much of nu' = {eta, 2iota, eta} to fork off a new greek letter. And indeed in the Lambda algebra, nu-bar = \5 \3 = Sq^0(nu') = Sq^0(\2 \1). I say the next really new element after epsilon is mu in the 8 stem, born on S^3 with Hopf inv sigma''', Toda's name for the unstable element which stably is 8 sigma. That's why I use the phrase `first really new element', since indeed you have to work to get sigma', sigma'', and sigma''', but Toda is good enough at this to just go with primes. Similarly we have nu' in the 3 stem, born on S^3 with Hopf inv eta, which is the first example of a Toda bracket, nu' = {eta, 2iota, eta}, due earlier to Barratt, who also proved that H(nu') = eta because of the facts eta . 2iota = [iota_2, iota_2] on S^2, and 2iota . eta = 0 on S^3 Toda generalized this to his formula for calculating the Hopf inv of a Toda bracket, which he used e.g. on all the elements I mentioned here.